The river that runs through California has become a symbol of environmental degradation in the United States.
Its waters, once a source of joy and pleasure for the state, are now toxic, polluted and toxic in ways that could kill people.
The Great Lakes are in danger of becoming a global symbol of climate change, pollution and global warming.
And yet, despite its history of exploitation, the Great Lakes have been spared a death toll.
So what is behind this disconnect between the river’s ecological status and its impact on our health?
The river that goes through the heart of California is the Red River.
It flows through a swath of the state known as the California Plateau.
For decades, the river was considered sacred and sacred rivers are often celebrated and considered a sign of life and fertility.
In fact, the Red is considered a symbol for life and the afterlife.
But for generations, it was a toxic waterway.
The Red was once a sacred river that connected the Great Basin to the Pacific Ocean.
But as the world began to develop and become industrialized, it became polluted, and became an industrial and urban sewer that polluted the environment in many ways.
The Red is now known as Lake Michigan, and the area it passes through has a high concentration of lead and mercury.
Its current population, 1.3 million, are over-represented among those with high blood pressure, high cholesterol and diabetes.
Many live in areas that are already struggling with water pollution.
“There are people who have high blood pressures and are having diabetes,” said Jessica Stang, a water resource specialist with the California Department of Water Resources.
“We see a lot of kids with diabetes and high blood cholesterol who are coming into the water, and they’re also suffering from lead poisoning.”
In a way, the lake is like a giant pollution sewer, said Stang.
As a result, many of its waters are being treated like hazardous waste and are not being treated to the level of the Great Salt Lake.
The water that was once used to drink and bathe the world is now used for washing dishes and cleaning up after children.
The river is also the home of millions of birds, including migratory birds that migrate to and from California.
The red-colored algae blooms and fish kill the migratory species.
It also attracts mosquitoes that carry disease, and it is known for its invasive species like the silver carp.
The Great Lakes also have some of the highest rates of asthma in the country.
And in fact, it’s become such a toxic sewer that it has become the focus of several state investigations into water quality and the health of the local residents.
“I think the environmental justice movement in this country is really at the forefront,” said David Smith, a professor at the University of California, Riverside who has been studying the Great Lake for 30 years.
“They are very focused on how to protect the Great River and to protect their own.”
It’s a complex situation, and one that has not gone unnoticed by those who have been fighting to protect this river and its waterways.
The fight to protect water rightsThe Great Lake has long been a battleground for those who want to preserve the water it used to be known for.
In the late 1800s, there was a movement to protect and conserve the Red, and after World War II, a federal law gave states a wide latitude to protect river systems, such as the Red.
In 1965, the U.S. Congress passed the Great Rivers Protection Act, which required states to protect rivers.
The act created a task force to study the environmental impact of water use, and in 1974, the group recommended an eight-step plan for protecting the Red and other river systems.
In the early 2000s, the environmental groups that worked on the task force said that it was still too complicated to determine how much water was being used and how effectively it was being managed.
But the Environmental Protection Agency has been working on a water management plan since 2002.
The new plan, released in July, says that the EPA is committed to reducing pollution, particularly in waterways that have high concentrations of lead.
The EPA is also looking to improve the management of the lake by using technology that will improve the water quality.
It’s not just looking at the river.
The agency is looking at pollution in other water bodies and in other places.
It has started a pilot project to test new technologies to monitor the water’s quality.
“The agency is moving forward with the most ambitious water quality plan in the history of the agency,” said Joe Lofgren, a spokesman for the EPA.
“This plan is focused on water quality management for the most vulnerable of the most polluting sources of pollution, like the Red.”
The agency has also been studying ways to improve water quality by moving into new areas.
The EPA is partnering with local communities to study how best to move people, produce more clean water and move away from industrial development.
The goal is to reduce lead, which can cause a variety of health problems